![]() ![]() This is obviously not true, since there's an obvious alternative explanation for ~50% win rates. What analysis? What is the methodology? Where are the results? > Analysis of player win/loss ratios clearly shows that all players win roughly 50% of games, regardless of their "skill". It makes about as many assertions as are possible in that word count, but does not present any evidence. I have read all ~250 words of the article. This isn’t incompatible with their business model - casinos profit on poker despite it being possible to win money at poker because you aren’t playing against the house, you’re playing against each other, and the house is just taking a rake (essentially renting out the dealer and table to the players). ![]() Note: without investigating those presumed skill-based games looking for ways they introduce unavoidable randomness, I can’t be sure they really are skill-based.Ĭonclusion is it seems quite plausible Skillz does offer some partly-skill-based competitive games where you can earn cash by beating other players on your own merits. From a quick review of the games listed on there are a few that are purely luck-based (Blackout Bingo, Bingo Cash), most that have a very small skill or strategy cap before they’re luck-dominated (multiple Solitaires, Match 3 games, Blackjack, Spades, Bubble popping games, Yahtzee), and a few that seem skill-based (Big Buck Hunter marksman game, Pool, Bowling). ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |